Adam Rogacki, independent AI advisory.
For boards, investors, and leadership teams assessing AI claims, EU AI Act exposure, vendor risk, and production readiness.
Redacted artifacts, extraction logic, and AI Act mapping from Adam-owned work.
Lease intake, extraction paths, and review states for the working detail AI diligence actually needs.
From AI ambition to system inventory, risk class, controls, and a decision a board can sign.
Data quality, review UX, vendor exposure, and rollout risk learned from systems that had to ship.
The advisory process is built around one thing: turning an AI claim into a decision that can be read, challenged, and acted on.
We start with the decision, deadline, system boundary, and evidence already available.
Claims are checked against decks, workflows, vendor language, data exposure, and delivery reality.
The work turns ambiguity into a ranked map of upside, control gaps, dependencies, and cost.
The final output is a clear recommendation: build, buy, defer, kill, or govern differently.
If implementation makes sense, rogacki.ai can hand off to AROG AI without blending the advice.
Fixed-scope enough to be useful, senior enough to affect decisions. Commercial scope is quoted after intake, once the decision, urgency, and evidence base are clear.
Investors, boards, or leadership teams testing AI claims in software, services, CRE, or regulated workflow assets.
European leadership teams who need a sequenced AI value-creation plan.
European companies running 1-3 high-stakes AI initiatives at once.
The output is designed to make a decision easier to defend. It shows the claim, the system boundary, the data exposure, and the action path in one place.
The work is strongest when there is a real decision, real evidence, and a clear owner for the next move.
The first message should make the call sharper before it starts. Send the decision, timing, AI claim, and available artifacts. No sensitive files are needed at this stage.
Request a diligence callAdam's AI assistant can qualify the first inquiry before a call: decision, deadline, workflow, risk, and available evidence.
This is a real AI voice assistant for shaping the first inquiry. It does not pretend to be Adam, does not quote prices, and should not receive confidential documents.
Four questions. One concise intake. Clearly AI.
The assistant loads only after you press start.
adam@rogacki.aiAnonymous proof is better than borrowed credibility.
A public link, approved artifact, or direct Adam approval. Otherwise it does not ship.
Diligence questions where AI claims, data exposure, vendor dependency, or automation upside materially affect the investment thesis.
European leadership teams need AI roadmaps that survive implementation reality, budget constraints, and EU regulatory exposure.
Boards under value-creation pressure need a sober read on what to build, buy, defer, or kill.
Advisory stays independent. If AROG AI becomes the right implementation path, that handoff is explicit and scoped after the advisory decision.
AI strategy, diligence, EU AI Act readiness, and builder judgment.
Implementation studio for production AI workflows that need to ship as software.
Send the context before the call: company, role, problem, and what decision the work needs to support.
AI assistant, not Adam's voice.
